This story just gets stranger, and stranger by the hour. Farook’s former neighbor and good friend who allegedly sold Farook the rifles, checked himself into a mental hospital the day of the attack.
So remember how InfoWars reported on Carly Fiorina dropping that bombshell on MSNBC last Thursday (the day after the shooting)? Carly Fiorina was being interviewed on MSNBC’s Morning Show and she said:
“The ATF believes that someone purchased the guns on behalf of the police department and somehow those guns ended up in the hands of this guy (Syed Farook) so it actually does not sound at all like this man purchased a firearm.”
As soon as she said it, MSNBC news anchors, Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski got visibly upset and very quickly changed the subject.
So wait, hold up a minute..how did a firearm destined for a police department end up in the hands of the San Bernadino shooter?
So the next day the mainstream media came out with what seemed like a cover story, about how the shooter had bought the two “assault style rifles” from a “friend” and that they were “legally transferred” to him that way. So how did this “friend” obtain guns that were bought for the police department?
So now today it’s being reported that the “friend” who sold Farook the rifles was his former neighbor and “good friend” Enrique Marquez. And this guy Enrique Marquez just happened to check himself into a mental hospital on the day of the shooting. Does “checked himself in” actually mean “wouldn’t go along with the hoax”?
So the mainstream media managed to find the GOOFIEST photos of this guy (Enrique Marquez)…no doubt to make him appear as nutty as possible. These are the two main photos they’re using of him in all their articles and news stories. How embarrassing.
I mean really? These are the best pictures they could find of the guy? No agenda here folks…move along now.
So this dude is allegedly the source of these police guns the shooter just happened to use in the shooting. And he just happened to check himself into the looney bin the same day of the shooting? More like they took him away unwillingly in a straight jacket. Just a theory but something’s obviously not right here.
The big question here is…how did a firearm destined for a police department end up in the hands of the San Bernadino shooter?
Oh yeah..and the police always handcuff dead people after they shoot them to death. This is supposed to be a picture of the dead body of Sayed Farook. Listening to one of his attorney’s interviews it sounds like the family’s legal counsel is saying they think the couple was already handcuffed inside the SUV before they were shot to death by police. From everything I’ve heard from them it sounds like they definitely believe their clients were made out to be the patsies of this event.
And it’s just my observation but Syed Farook’s families emotions seem real (nose snotting, tears, etc.) but I have yet to see any real emotion from the victim’s families.
For example check out Peekay’s video…Wolf Blitzer interviewing the family of the Iranian woman who was supposedly killed. The dad and the 3 young kids are standing there looking bored as hell with no real trace of emotion anywhere on their faces. Wolf is interviewing the woman’s daughter who looks to be about 13 or 14 years old. This is not even 24 hours after their mother was supposedly blown away in a random mass shooting at her work’s Christmas party. Listen to the daughter being interviewed by Wolf, speaking about her dead mother. A stranger who doesn’t give a sh** couldn’t tell a story this calmly.
And then we can’t forget how all of the early news reports were reporting THREE shooters. And anyone who was listening to the live police scanners during the event heard law enforcement talking about 3 suspects. They even aired interviews with eyewitnesses who were there during the shooting, who said the shooters were 3 white men dressed in military attire
An eyewitness account by Sally Abdelmageed, a worker at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, reported “three men dressed in all black, military attire, with vests on they were holding assault rifles.” She told CBS news:
“As soon as they opened up the doors to building three… one of them… started to shoot into the room. I couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on… black cargo pants, the kind with the big puffy pockets on the side… long sleeve shirt… glove… huge assault rifle… six magazines… I just saw three dressed exactly the same.” “It looked like their skin color was white. They look like they were athletic build and they appeared to be tall.”
Another witness backed up Abdelmageed’s story. Juan Hernandez told a local NBC affiliate he saw “three white men in military fatigues” leaving the scene:
(And just an interesting side note..this YouTube video is now “unlisted” meaning it is not searchable and can no longer be found unless you have the direct URL. How convenient for them to have removed this man’s testimony so it can no longer be found by searching YouTube or any of the search engines.)
So although these eye witness accounts cast MAJOR doubt on the official narrative, they were ignored and the radical Muslim jihadist angle predominated.
There are SO many bizarre details surrounding this event, but one other thing that just really stuck out to me was the strange anomalies in this picture. This is a picture from one of the victims fundraising accts.
This is a picture of him w/ his family of 6 kids. Over $200,000 was raised in just 24 hours for Michael Raymond Wetzel who was supposedly killed in the shooting.
The story goes “The YouCaring fundraising page was established by Lil’ Mamas, a website and support group for moms. Renee Wetzel, Michael’s wife and a Lil’ Mamas member, contacted the site Wednesday when she couldn’t reach her husband, who was “in a meeting and a shooter came in,” according to her post. “There are multiple people dead/shot. I can’t get a hold of him.” So they immediately set up a fundraising site for her based on the off chance he might be dead?
Anyways what got me is the obvious photoshopping of their family picture, used as the main picture on the fundraising site. (In Sandy Hook and other known false flag shootings a majority of the victim’s family photos show obvious signs of photo shopping.) This is a screenshot from one of Professors Doom’s videos.
The girl on the right in the pink…her huge long left arm especially struck me …I mean look at that thing. That’s ridiculously doctored. No one has arms that long. I’ve been going back & forth wondering if the victims were real in this shooting but it’s little things like this that make me say “Nah”. So these are just a few things I noticed. I’m obviously open to new evidence but so far it’s not looking good folks.
The following is a GREAT clip to show anyone who keeps scoffing at you calling “everything a false flag.” It’s author Naomi Wolf (who’s actually quite liberal) explaining to a huge room of ppl why the reflexive vilification of people questioning big media stories is totally uncalled for. And why it’s absolutely ridiculous to blindly accept the canned narrative by the government and mainstream media. People need to understand that a law was passed in 2013 making propaganda against the American public completely LEGAL. Let me repeat…it is now legal for our govt to air propaganda (aka fake stories) to the American ppl.
The Smith Mundt act was repealed in 2013 which was put in place decades ago to protect the American ppl against a fascist govt who might do these kinds of things. Well in 2013 it was repealed authorizing our own govt (for the first time in history) to use propaganda against us via the news media.
This means that it is now COMPLETELY LEGAL for our own govt and news media to create THEATRE in order to manipulate the American people. Mainstream media can now under LAW lie, manipulate, stage and straight up manufacture news events and stories in order to gain public support and mold public opinion. Most ppl cannot imagine they’d do this to us but it’s b/c most ppl don’t think like sociopaths.
They need to realize that the media doesn’t spend hours & hours of coverage on something w/out there being a specific directive and purpose behind it. This is a GREAT clip to show anyone who gets upset at you for calling “everything a false flag.” This is well known author Naomi Wolf explaining to a room full of pretty important people why the default position (on nationally televised mass shootings) must now be disbelief. Save this short clip and show it to your friends who scoff at you. It will definitely turn them silent.